AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Verified bill of particulars new york4/27/2024 I’m also proud to announce that Hurwitz Fine went a step further and received Certification “Plus” status, which indicates that we have successfully achieved 30% diverse representation in current leadership roles and pipeline activities. ![]() As a firm, we are committed to diversity in the law and are thrilled to officially be Mansfield certified! The initiative also includes a commitment by the firm to be transparent in our internal governance, job descriptions and advancement criteria. In some jurisdictions, newsletters such as this may be considered Attorney Advertising.Įxciting news for Hurwitz Fine as summer kicks off! I’m proud to announce that Hurwitz Fine has achieved Midsize Mansfield Certification! Mansfield Rule Certification is a nationally recognized law firm diversity certification, which measures whether law firms have affirmatively considered at least 30 percent women, attorneys of color, LGBTQ+ and lawyers with disabilities for leadership and governance roles, partner promotions, formal client meeting opportunities, and senior lateral positions. The primary purpose of this newsletter is to provide timely educational information and commentary for our clients and subscribers. is pleased to present this monthly newsletter providing summaries of and access to the latest premises liability decisions from the New York State and Federal courts. Accordingly, the plainitffs' remaining contentions are without merit.īRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., RIVERA, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.As a public service, Hurwitz Fine P.C. Co., 16 AD2d 956, 956).Īs the defendant correctly contends, the Supreme Court did not direct the plaintiffs to provide a verified supplemental bill of particulars beyond a supplemental response to the location of the accident. Co., 101 AD2d 625, 625 Lichtenstein v New York Life Ins. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the plaintiffs to supplement their response to the defendant's demand with a more specific description of the accident location ( see CPLR 3043 Mayer v Hoang, 83 AD3d 1516, 1518 Castellano v Norwegian Christian Home & Health Ctr., Inc., 24 AD3d 490, 491 Holland v St. In an order entered March 3, 2021, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendant's motion and directed the plaintiffs, among other things, to supply "a verified supplemental bill of particulars, free of any objections," and "a supplemental response to the question of the specific location of the accident." The plaintiffs appeal. The defendants moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiffs to provide, among other things, a supplemental verified bill of particulars that provided a more specific description of the accident location. In response to the defendant's demand for a verified bill of particulars, the plaintiffs objected to paragraph number two, which requested information regarding the "exact place and location where it is claimed the alleged incident occurred." The plaintiffs then reiterated the address of the school as the "approximate location of the occurrence." 142 - Amalia Castro School located at 100 Attorney Street in New York. In the complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the incident occurred at P.S. ![]() The infant plaintiff, by her father and natural guardian, and her father suing derivatively, commenced this action against the defendant, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries. On or about September 11, 2015, the infant plaintiff allegedly was injured at a school owned and operated by the defendant. ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiffs to provide outstanding discovery. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Allan B. O'Connor, O'Connor, Hintz & Deveney, LLP, Melville, NY (Eileen M. ![]() ![]() Mouton, Jr., LLC, New York, NY, for appellants.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |